A practical guide to organizing intellectual work

The idealist method is one that proposes a return of thought to itself as the only condition for the truth and affirmation of reality. Compared to change and life it gives recognized priority to absolute rules in the name of a rational immobilist and permanent dogmatism that for a long time has committed to the idea of the uniqueness of scientific canons. But does the dogmatic application of these canons allow us to take sufficient account of the complex objects required to study human specificities? How can we think about the deontologization or subversion (Frantz Fanon/ Matthieu Renault) of this paradigm for a broader livelier and more open conception of the world? In any case there seems to be no justification for science to progress in only one direction as for example Claire Joubert puts it: Science is really the meaning of the practical domains of knowledge based on discursivity. This assumes that every act of thinking is necessarily an act of rethinking (Claire Joubert). This then is one of the messages concealed behind this first volume.