Aristotle's Favorite Tragedy: Oedipus or Cresphontes?

The Poetics is considered the foundation of Western dramatic and literary theory and readers interpret Aristotle on the basis of Chapter 13 to claim that Oedipus with its pity fear and horrible ending is always the finest type of tragedy. Some specialists however discuss Aristotle also stating in Chapter 14 that the happily-ending plays like Cresphontes are the finest with the type of plays like Oedipus which involve an agent killing or committing great suffering to a family member and only recognizing the family connection afterwards being second-best. This passage obviously creates a dilemma. No commentator has ever been able to resolve it to the satisfaction of the profession and as a result Oedipus maintains its stature. Indeed the specialist Elizabeth Belfiore recently published (The Elements of Tragedy in A Companion to Aristotle ed. Georgios Anagnostopoulos 2009) a defense of Oedipus as the best play for Aristotle in spite of the explicit ranking of Chapter 14.Gregory Scott here demonstrates instead that Aristotle actually means what he says in Chapter 14: Tragōidia originally goat-song or the like and typically translated misleadingly as tragedy really involves for him serious drama primarily about good people and Aristotle says three times in the book that it can end in misfortune or in fortune. Scott building on his ground-breaking work from 2003 Purging the Poetics (Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy) that is reprinted in his Aristotle on Dramatic Musical Composition: The Real Role of Literature Catharsis Music and Dance in the POETICS (2nd ed. 2018) resolves the dilemma between Chapters 13 and 14 once and for all showing that the latter half of Chapter 14 is about tragōidia in general while the earlier text is only about one or two (or a mixture) of the subclasses of tragōidia as given in Chapter 18 and rarely discussed by commentators: tragedy of suffering complex tragedy tragedy of character and simple/spectacular tragedy. The chapters are arbitrary divisions from the Renaissance and the texts must have both come from different original treatises of Aristotle and been assembled badly after his death or the texts were part of a much larger work now lost in which the rest of the theory and the transitions from one topic to another were delineated.In addition to resolving the perennial dilemma and shining a better light on Aristotles notion of tragedy Scott also explains why the best type of play like Cresphontes is better than the second-best one when they both have recognition and reversal the conditions for the best kind of plot for Aristotle. With all of this in place we can easily detect another dilemma that rarely gets discussed in the ranking of the four types of tragedy in Chapter 14: The third best type which is not problematic in this context involves an agent who knows someone is a family member and who kills the member anyway; we can easily deduce Medea is an example. However all known commentators accept that Aristotle speaks of Sophocles horribly-ending Antigone when he exemplifies the worst of the four types. Yet the reason Aristotle gives for the last-place finish is that Antigone is both apathes without suffering and miaron shocking or revolting. Scott explains in detail not only that Aristotle must be speaking of Euripides version of Antigone which ends happily but why its last-place ranking results.For Updates and Errata: www.epspress.com/ArFavUpdates.html