Art Language and Figure in Merleau-Ponty

<i>Art Language and Figure in Merleau-Ponty: Excursions in Hyper-Dialectic</i> considers Merleau-Ponty's later ontology of language in the light of his +oefigured philosophy +? which places the work of art at the centre of its investigation. Kaushik argues that since for Merleau-Ponty the work of art actualizes a sensible ontology that would otherwise be invisible to the history of dialectics it undermines the fundamental difference between being and linguistic structures.<br/> <br/><i>Art Language and Figure in Merleau-Ponty</i> takes up the radical task of the figured philosophy to render sensible and linguistic spaces prior to the thought of their separation. Kaushik situates Merleau-Ponty's criticisms of Saussure's linguistic system as well as a more general repudiation of the act of inscribing in favour of an abstracted textual meaning in this context. Following the artists most important to Merleau-Ponty's own writings on art such as Paul Klee and his fascination with hieroglyphics and extending these analyses to more recent 21st Century artists such as Cy Twombly Kaushik takes an excursion into the places where art and language image and text drawing and writing figure and discourse are interlaced in Merleau-Ponty's last ontology. In view of these intersections Kaushik ultimately argues the work of art gives us the spaces where the possibilities of philosophy both past and future reside. As the first sustained treatment into the relationship between art and language this is an important contribution to Meleau-Ponty's philosophy and scholars of aesthetics.