Auditor independence and regulation

Essay from the year 2006 in the subject Business economics - Revision Auditing grade: 88 % University of Glamorgan language: English abstract: This essay is concerned with the pros and cons of auditor independence and describes the way to the current audit regulation. The editor specifies five major threats which could jeopardise auditor independence. If auditors have any financial or personal interests in their clients then the self-interest threat the self-review threat the advocacy threat the familiarity threat and finally the intimidation threat may occur. The intimidation threat is stressed as the most important one: as auditors highly rely on companies' directors. They have the power to interfere with auditors' work and can cease all lucrative non-audit service contracts if auditors do not agree with their view. Moreover auditors' remuneration is determined and auditors are appointed by them in reality. Furthermore it is emphasised that especially in recent times some safeguards have been implemented by the profession regulation within the assurance clients and within auditing firms to eliminate the above-mentioned threats. Within the assurance client introduced independent audit committees are widespread. Further auditing firms have implemented their own more narrowly prescribed ethical standards. Beyond this it is highlighted that legislation is of paramount importance. The Companies Act 1985 1989 2004 and above all the ISA were enacted to enhance auditor independence. The third section commences by describing the past of audit regulation. It is explained that in response to the growing public criticism in the 1960s and 1970s the professional accountancy bodies began slowly to introduce auditing standards ethical codes disciplinary licensing and monitoring arrangements. Further in the aftermath of the demise of many large companies in the 1980s the government started to implement a new regulatory framework to reduce audit