Bishop Gauden the Author of Icôn Basilikè Further Shewn in Answer to Recent Remarks of [C.] Wordsworth [In King Charles the First the Author of Icon Basilike]

<p>This volume delves into the historical controversy surrounding the authorship of Icôn Basilikè a spiritual autobiography attributed to King Charles I of England. Henry John Todd and Christopher Wordsworth meticulously examine the evidence supporting John Gauden's claim as the true author. </p><p>Addressing recent remarks by C. Wordsworth the book presents further arguments and analysis to reinforce the case for Gauden's authorship. It scrutinizes the literary style historical context and available documentation to shed light on this enduring mystery. The work offers valuable insights into the political and religious climate of 17th-century England inviting readers to reconsider the accepted narrative surrounding one of history's most debated texts. A key resource for understanding the complexities of historical attribution and royal representation.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p>