Canon Crossfire

<p><strong><em>★What if the case for Christianity collapses under the weight of the Protestant Bible itself?</em></strong></p><p>◆In <strong>Canon Crossfire</strong> retired attorney <strong>Matthew Mark McWhorter</strong> presents a bold evidence-based investigation into the <strong>Christian biblical canon</strong>-one that began in <strong>skepticism</strong> and ended in an unexpected conversion. Written for critical thinkers theology buffs skeptics and believers alike this book explores a fundamental question: <strong>Did the early Church reject the Catholic Apocrypha-or were they always part of authentic Christian Scripture?</strong></p><p>◆Many modern <strong>Protestant</strong> theologians assert that the early Church embraced the <strong>Jewish Old Testament canon</strong> while rejecting the <strong>Apocrypha</strong>. This claim is often used to support the integrity of the 66-book Protestant Bible and by extension the core truth claims of Christianity. But <strong>McWhorter</strong> dismantles this assumption with meticulous historical research legal-style reasoning and scriptural analysis all centered around a single explosive question: <strong>What if the Apocrypha were part of the apostolic deposit-and what if rejecting them undermines the very case Protestants use to defend the resurrection of Christ?</strong></p><p>◆<strong>Canon Crossfire</strong> cross-examines all the Church Fathers used to support <strong>Protestant canon theory</strong>. Origen Jerome Rufinus Athanasius Epiphanius Cyril of Jerusalem Eusebius Irenaeus Clement of Alexandria Polycarp Justin Martyr and even the misunderstood Melito of Sardis are called to the stand. One by one their actual words and practices reveal that these early voices of the faith did not reject <strong>Susanna Baruch</strong> or other<strong> apocryphal</strong> works-in fact they frequently preached them as sacred inspired Scripture taught to them by the Apostles and their disciples.</p><p>◆This book does not attempt to prove the <strong>Apocrypha</strong> are divinely inspired. Instead it aims to prove that the early Church whose judgment Protestants trust to define the New Testament did accept these books-and that this acceptance is not an obscure minority view but the mainstream and universal stance for the first four centuries of Christianity.</p><p>◆Through legal analogies statistical references from the <strong>King James Bible</strong> New Testament cross-references to <strong>Apocrypha</strong> and primary source analysis <strong>McWhorter</strong> argues that a <strong>Protestant</strong> rejection of the <strong>Apocrypha</strong> undermines the same evidentiary standards used to defend the <strong>Gospels</strong>. If the canon lists and patristic witness are flawed regarding the Old Testament how can they be reliable regarding the New?</p><p>◆<strong>Canon Crossfire</strong> is not just a theological deep dive-it is a <strong>spiritual and intellectual journey</strong> from <strong>atheism to belief</strong>. Written with honesty wit and a willingness to admit human fallibility this book invites readers to examine the <strong>foundation of Christian faith</strong> with fresh eyes.</p><p><strong><em>Does your belief rest on evidence or assumption? Read Canon Crossfire and decide for yourself.</em></strong></p><p><strong>All proceeds from this book will be donated.</strong>★ Visit the author's website: CanonCrossFire.com ★ </p><p></p>