Coena Mystica: Debating Reformed Eucharistic Theology: 2 (Mercersburg Theology Study)

Description: Coena Mystica contains the never-before-reprinted text of John Williamson Nevins response to Charles Hodges devastating critiques of his 1846 magnum opus The Mystical Presence. Initially appearing in twelve issues of the little-known Weekly Messenger of the German Reformed Church and almost entirely neglected by historians since Nevins response included the full text of Hodges article with his rejoinders interspersed every few pages. These articles in addition to providing a lively and illuminating debate on the roots of Reformed eucharistic theology take the disputants into such fields as the nature of the church the development of doctrine the person and work of Christ and the merits of German idealism. The quality of the historical argument and theological acumen here displayed makes this exchange one of the landmark theological controversies of the nineteenth century a gift to historians of the period students of Reformed theology and anyone seeking to better understand the contentious legacy of the Protestant Reformation. The present critical edition carefully preserves the original text while providing extensive introductions annotations and bibliography to orient the modern reader and facilitate further scholarship. The Mercersburg Theology Study Series is an attempt to make available for the first time in attractive readable and scholarly modern editions the key writings of the nineteenth-century movement known as the Mercersburg Theology. An ambitious multi-year project this aims to make an important contribution to the scholarly community and to the broader reading public who can at last be properly introduced to this unique blend of American and European Reformed and Catholic theology. Endorsements: This debate on the Lords Supper is by no means of narrow denominational interest only; for Hodge and Nevin represent doctrinal and sacramental views that are ardently defended to this day--not least in ecumenical discussions. We thus have here a welcome and instructive addition to what is already proving to be a useful series of carefully introduced and edited texts. --Alan P. F. Sell University of Wales Trinity Saint David Too often in contemporary theology . . . the Eucharist is identified with its Zwinglian variant according to which the sacrament is largely a spiritual memorial. In the nineteenth century this view was championed by Charles Hodge who eschewed the higher sacramentalism of Calvin. By contrast his erstwhile student John Williamson Nevin attempted to restate the higher Calvinistic account of communion. The battle of journal articles that ensued reprinted here for the first time since the nineteenth century is a window into this debate. --Oliver Crisp Fuller Theological Seminary These are essential documents pertaining to one of the most important theological debates in American history. They remain of great interest today for not only deepening how Reformed churches might understand the Lords Supper in accord with Calvin but also for the possibility of Reformed ecumenical convergence with churches from which they have long been divided. . . . The editors have performed a great service to theology and the church. --George Hunsinger Princeton Theological Seminary No theological debate in nineteenth-century America displayed more erudition logical acumen and knowledge of European scholarship than the clash between Hodge and Nevin over the sacraments. The editors of this volume not only provide stunningly good introductions but they also arrange the material in an ingenious way that deepens our insights into the issues and enables us to easily follow the discussion. --E. Brooks Holifield Emory University About the Contributor(s): John Williamson Nevin (1803-1886) was a leading nineteenth-century Reformed theologian. Originally trained in the Presbyterian Church he took up a teaching post at Mercersburg Seminary of the German Ref