Combat Effectiveness of the Combined Arms Battalion Scout Platoon

<p>This study is designed to discover if the Combined Arms Battalion (CAB) scout platoon is capable of accomplishing its doctrinal mission on the battlefield. The research did in fact show that the CAB scout platoon is effective at accomplishing its doctrinal missions. The methodology used to conduct the analysis is based on the Army capabilities based requirements generation process. The organizational capabilities were analyzed against the critical tasks associated with each of its doctrinal missions to determine success or failure. This study recommends several changes to the CAB scout platoon to increase its capabilities. The recommended changes represent improvements to doctrine organization personnel and material in order to make it more effective on the battlefield. The recommendations are intended to increase the capabilities of the CAB scout platoon in order to make it a more flexible organization. While this study validates the current organization it remains to be seen if commanders will employ the unit as directed by doctrine. To ensure capabilities and requirements are aligned; the continued analysis of the effects of modularity on the reconnaissance community is essential.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p><br>