Comparative Constitutional Law

<p>This new 4 volume collection meets the need for an authoritative reference work to help researchers and students navigate and make better sense of an abundance of scholarship in comparative constitutional law. Topics include constitution-making and amendment; the different structural components of constitutional governance; the interaction of constitutional law with transnational sources of law; and theoretical and practical aspects of constitutional legitimacy.</p> <p>Volume II: </p><p>Constitution-Making, Methodology, and Interpretation </p><p>Part 5. Constitution-Making </p><p>15. Vivien Hart, ‘Democratic Constitution Making’<i>, United States Institute of Peace Special Report</i> 2, 2003.</p><p>16. Jon Elster, ‘Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-Making Process’, <i>Duke Law Journal</i>, 45, 1995, 364-396.</p><p>17. Tom Ginsburg, Zachary Elkins and Justin Blount, ‘Does the Process of Constitution-Making Matter<i>?</i>’, <i>Annual Review of Law and Social Science</i>, 5, 2009, 201-223.</p><p>18. David Landau, extract from ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’<i>,</i> <i>University of California Davis Law Review</i>, 47, 2013, 191-203, 259-260.</p><p>19. Kim Lane Scheppele, ‘On the Unconstitutionality of Constitutional Change: An Essay in Honor of Laìszloì Soìlyom’, in Csehi Zoltan et al (eds), <i>Viva vox iuris civilis: tanulmaìnyok Soìlyom Laìszloì</i> 287 (Szent Istvan Tarsulat, 2012), pp. 286-310.</p><p>Part 6. Is there a Methodology of Comparative Constitutional Law?</p><p>20. Mark Tushnet, extract from ‘The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law’<i>, Yale Law Journal</i>,<i> </i>108, 1999, 1225-1242, 1257-1301, 1303-1306.</p><p>21. Ran Hirschl, ‘The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law’, <i>American Journal of Comparative Law</i>,<i> </i>53, <i>2005, 125-155.</i></p><p>22. David S. Law, ‘Constitutions’<i>, </i>in Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer (eds), <i>The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research</i>, (Oxford University Press, 2010)<i>, pp. 376-398. </i></p><p>23. Theunis Roux, ‘Comparative Constitutional Studies: Two Fields or One?’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 2017, 123-139. </p><p>24. Vicki Jackson, ‘Comparative Constitutional Law: Methodologies’, in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), <i>The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law</i>, (Oxford University Press, 2012)<i>, pp. 54-74. </i></p><p>25. David S. Law and Mila Versteeg, ‘The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism’, <i>California Law Review, </i>99, 2011, 1163-1164, 1171-1202, 1246-1249.</p><p>26. Günter Frankenberg, ‘Constitutional Transfers: the IKEA Theory Revisited’, <i>International Journal of Constitutional Law</i>, 8, 2010, 563-579. </p><p>27. Vicki C. Jackson, ‘Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement’<i>, Harvard Law Review</i>, 109, 2005, 109-128.</p><p>Part 7. Interpretive Methodology: Proportionality, Legalism, Originalism, Purposivism</p><p>7.1 Proportionality</p><p>28. Robert Alexy, ‘Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality’, <i>Ration Juris, </i>16, 2003, 131-140.</p><p>29. Grégoire C. N. Webber, ‘Challenging the Age of Balancing’, in <i>The Negotiable Constitution</i>, (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 87-115. </p><p>7.2 Purposivism</p><p>30. Aharon Barak, ‘Constitutional Interpretation’, in <i>Purposive Interpretation in Law</i> (trans. Sari Bashi), (Princeton University Press, 2005), pp. 370-393.</p><p>7.3 Legalism</p><p>31. Jeffrey Goldsworthy, extract from ‘Australia: Devotion to Legalism’, in Jeffrey Goldsworthy (ed.), <i>Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study</i>, (Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 114-136, 141-160.</p>