<p>This new 4 volume collection meets the need for an authoritative reference work to help researchers and students navigate and make better sense of an abundance of scholarship in comparative constitutional law. Topics include constitution-making and amendment; the different structural components of constitutional governance; the interaction of constitutional law with transnational sources of law; and theoretical and practical aspects of constitutional legitimacy.</p> <p>Volume III: </p><p>Government Structures and Frameworks </p><p>Part 8. Separation of Powers</p><p>32. Charles Manga Fombad and Enyinna Nwauche, ‘Africa’s Imperial Presidents: Immunity, Impunity and Accountability’<i>,</i> <i>African Journal of Legal Studies, </i>5, 2012, 91-118.</p><p>33. Bruce Ackerman, extract from ‘The New Separation of Powers’, <i>Harvard Law </i>Review, 113, 2000, 643-671, 690-697, 716-722.</p><p>34. Charles Fombad, ‘The Diffusion of South African-Style Institutions? A Study in Comparative Constitutionalism’, in Rosalind Dixon and Theunis Roux (eds) <i>Constitutional Triumphs, Constitutional Disappointments: A Critical Assessment of the 1996 South African Constitution’s Local And International Influence</i> (Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 359-366 &amp; 370-387. </p><p>Part 9. Federalism and Consociationalism</p><p>35. Cheryl Saunders, ‘Constitutional Arrangements of Federal Systems’<i>, Publius: The Journal of Federalism</i>, 25, 1995, 61-79.</p><p>36. Sujit Choudhry and Nathan Hume, ‘Federalism, Devolution and Secession: From Classical to Post-conflict Federalism’, in Rosalind Dixon and Tom Ginsburg (eds),<i> Comparative Constitutional Law</i>, (Edward Elgar, 2011), pp. 356-384.</p><p>37.<i> Canadian Secession Reference Case, </i>Supreme Court of Canada, Part III.A, 1998</p><p>Part 10. Judicial Review</p><p>38. Tom Ginsburg, ‘Why Judicial Review?’, in <i>Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases</i>, (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 21-33.</p><p>39. Mauro Cappelletti, ‘Judicial Review in Comparative Perspective’, in <i>The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective</i>, (Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 117-149. </p><p>40. Wojciech Sadurski, ‘Judicial Review and the Protection of Constitutional Rights’, <i>Oxford Journal of Legal Studies</i>, 22, 2002, 275-299.</p><p>41. Stephen Gardbaum, ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’, <i>American Journal of Comparative Law</i>,<i> </i>49, 2001, 707-760.</p><p>Part 11. Amendment Rules</p><p>42. Donald S. Lutz, ‘Toward A Theory of Constitutional Amendment’<i>, American Political Science Review</i>,<i> </i>88, 1994, 355-370.</p><p>43. Madhav Khosla, ‘Constitutional Amendment’, in Sujit Choudhry, Madhav Khosla and Pratap Bhanu Mehta (eds), <i>The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution</i>, (Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 232-250</p><p>44. Joel Colón-Ríos, ‘Introduction: The Forms and Limits of Constitutional Amendments’, <i>International Journal of Constitutional Law, </i>13, 2015, 567-574</p><p>Part 12. Legal Traditions</p><p>45. Thomas Fleiner and Cheryl Saunders, ‘Constitutions Embedded in Different Legal Systems’<i>, </i>in Mark Tushnet, Thomas Fleiner and Cheryl Saunders (eds), <i>Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law</i> (Routledge, 2013), pp. 21-32 </p><p>46. Katharina Pistor, ‘The Demand for Constitutional Law’, <i>Constitutional Political Economy</i>, 13, 2002, 73-87.</p>