Differences

Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray famously insisted on their philosophical differences and this mutual insistence has largely guided the reception of their thought. What does it mean to return to Simone de Beauvoir and Luce Irigaray in light of questions and problems of contemporary feminism including intersectional and queer criticisms of their projects? How should we now take up amplify and surpass the horizons opened by their projects? Seeking answers to these questions the essays in this volume return to Beauvoir and Irigaray to find what the two philosophers share. And as the authors make clear the richness of Beauvoir and Irigaray's thought far exceeds the reductive parameters of the Eurocentric bourgeois second-wave debates that have constrained interpretation of their work. <br>The first section of this volume places Beauvoir and Irigaray in critical dialogue exploring the place of the material and the corporeal in Beauvoir's thought and in doing so reading Beauvoir in a framework that goes beyond a theory of gender and the humanism of phenomenology. The essays in the second section of the volume take up the challenge of articulating points of dialogue between the two focal philosophers in logic ethics and politics. Combined these essays resituate Beauvoir and Irigaray's work both historically and in light of contemporary demands breaking new ground in feminist philosophy.<br>