Dissertations on the English Language

<p>Young gentlemen who have gone through a course of academical studies and received the usual honors of a University are apt to contract a singular stiffness in their conversation.</p><p> </p><p>They read Lowth's Introduction or some other grammatical treatise believe what they read without examining the grounds of the writer's opinion and attempt to shape their language by his rules.</p><p> </p><p>Thus they enter the world with such phrases as a mean averse from if he have he has gotten and others which they deem correct; they pride themselves for some time in their superior learning and peculiarities; till further information or the ridicule of the public brings them to use the language of other people.</p><p> </p><p>Writers and Grammarians have attempted for centuries to introduce a subjunctive mode into English yet without effect; the language requires none distinct from the indicative; and therefore a subjunctive form stands in books only as a singularity and people in practice pay no regard to it.</p><p> </p><p>The people are right and a critical investigation of the subject warrants me in saying that common practice even among the unlearned is generally defensible on the principles of analogy and the structure of the language and that very few of the alterations recommended by Lowth and his followers can be vindicated on any better principle than some Latin rule or his own private opinion.</p>