Distinguo

Most modern critics (even those who have emphasized the evolution of Montaigne''s ideas) have sought to explain away the contradictions and incoherences of Montaigne''s Essais. Rendall investigates the role of these internal differences in the opinions recorded in voices and modes of discourse in logical levels in conceptions of writing and of reading through a series of careful lucid readings of selected passages of Essais. The author tracks their operation in the text and shows how Montaigne''s writing constantly recontextualizes his own discourse--through his practice of interpolating new material in successive editions and adding new chapters--as well as that of other authors through quotation paraphrase and commentary. Rather than merely negative features Rendall argues that such differences are essential to a practice of writing that both defines and challenges a notion of unity and can be seen as an uneasy and disturbing element related to a historical shift from earlier ways of controlling meaning to one based on the author function. This careful and lucid book presents a fresh and significant interpretation of the Essais and shows how Montaigne''s work might be read in a different way.