Due Diligence and the High Seas

<p>There has been a rapid growth of interest in due diligence, especially in the fields of environmental law and the law of the sea. Yet, confusion seems to surround this notion. Is due diligence a principle, a rule, a standard or something else? This book firstly explores thoroughly the concept of due diligence, its purpose and its mechanisms in order to propose a comprehensive theory of due diligence in harmony with the general law of State responsibility. </p><p>In the meantime, this book also explores the usefulness of due diligence to address modern challenges afflicting the high seas. Indeed, while the application of due diligence in transboundary contexts is well illustrated by jurisprudence, its applicability in areas beyond national jurisdiction remains unclear. Yet, a proper usage of this concept may be crucial for the protection of the high seas, as it allows for the intervention of international standards in this fragile area. Hopefully, the concept of due diligence can help compensate the insufficiencies of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea concerning the high seas. </p><p>Examining in detail the theory of due diligence, this book will interest international lawyers concerned with this notion. It also offers a new perspective on the UNCLOS through the prism of due diligence and will interest lawyers dealing with the protection of the marine environment and fisheries.</p> <p><strong>Introduction</strong></p><ol> <p> </p> <li>A Rediscovered Concept</li> <li>A "Constitution for the Ocean in Search of Content</li> <li>Due Diligence: A Bridge Between Instruments and Actors</li> <li>Outline of the Thesis</li> </ol><p>Chapter I: The Development of the General Theory of Due Diligence</p><p>Introduction</p><p>Section 1: The Early Development and Evolution of the Concept of Due Diligence: From Early Theories to the ILC Codification</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>The Theoretical Roots of Due Diligence: The State’s Responsibility for Acts of Private Actors</li> <li>The Early Judicial Practice on Due Diligence</li> <li>Conclusion</li> </ol><p>Section 2: The Work of the International Law Commission</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>The Work of the ILC on State Responsibility</li> <li>The Work of the ILC on State Liability</li> <li>Conclusion</li> </ol><p>Chapter II: The Contemporary Conception of Due Diligence: Clarifications and Constitutive Elements</p><p>Introduction</p><p>Section 1: The No-Harm Rule Confusion</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>The Tale of the Trail Smelter Arbitration</li> <li>The Corfu Channel Overinterpretation</li> <li>Conclusion</li> </ol><p>Section 2: Due Diligence: A Label of International Obligations</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>Due Diligence: The General Aspects</li> <li>Due Diligence: Specificities of Environmental Law</li> <li>Conclusion</li> </ol><p>Section 3: The Definition of Due Diligence and its Potential for the High Seas</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>Working Definition of Due Diligence</li> <li>The Utility of Due Diligence on the High Seas</li> <li>Conclusion</li> </ol><p>Chapter III: The Viability of Due Diligence on the High Seas</p><p>Introduction</p><p>Section 1: Legal Basis of Due Diligence Obligations on the High Seas</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>The UNCLOS: A Primordial Framework</li> <li>The Compliance Agreement: Reinforcement of Effective Control</li> <li>The FSA: A Primary Tool for International Cooperation</li> <li>The Guidelines on Deep-Sea Fisheries</li> <li>The FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and the IPOA-IUU</li> <li>The Voluntary Guidelines for Flag State Performance: Filling the "Inability" Gap</li> <li>Conclusion: The Internal and External Interplay of the UNCLOS</li> </ol><p>Section 2: Due Diligence Obligations and Control on the High Seas</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>Due Diligence and State-Owned Vessels</li> <li>Due Diligence and Private Vessels</li> <li>Conclusions on the Role of the Genuine Link</li> </ol><p>Chapter IV: Defining Due Diligence: From Interpretation to Law-Making</p><p>Introduction</p><p>Section 1: Due Diligence as an Informing Process</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>From Interpretation to Law-Making</li> <li>The Critical Role of the Judge in the Determination of Diligence</li> <li>Conclusion</li> </ol><p>Section 2: Shaping the UNCLOS for Modern Challenges</p><ol> <p> </p> <li>Informing the UNCLOS Through Due Diligence</li> <li>Gaps and Limits of Due Diligence </li> <li>Conclusion</li> </ol><p>Conclusion</p>