Evolution of and Approaches to the Concept of 'Fossilization'

Seminar paper from the year 2010 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics grade: 13 University of Münster (Englisches Seminar) course: Psycholinguistics language: English abstract: Fossilization is commonly described in SLA literature as a phenomenon of non-progression of learning despite continuous exposure to input adequate motivation to learn and sufficient opportunity for practice (Han 13). The Question behind this notion is: Are adults able to ever acquire native-like competence in an L2? And if some learners are what does this mean with respect to a majority of learners who seem not to be (cf. Han 13)? This bifurcation of possible outcomes in learning a second language is mirrored in the large variety of terms used to describe the concept of 'fossilization'. Among others it is described as 'virtual halt' 'linguistic monstrosities' 'plateau' 'rigor mortis' 'stopping short' 'fossilized variation' 'permanent optionality' 'siesta' [and] 'endstate'(Han 13 - 14). Such a range of labels reveals differing conceptual ideas about the topic's nature concerning its powers of spread within the learner's interlanguage its finitude reoccurring continuation and inevitableness. The terms 'linguistic monstrosities' and 'fossilized variation' rather hint at only parts of the interlanguage being affected by fossilization as opposed to the notion of a completely 'fossilized interlanguage'. The term 'virtual halt' supports this idea that while some aspects seem to be fossilized others might continue to develop. Whereas the terms 'rigor mortis' and 'endstate' convey an understanding of fossilization's lethal and final everlastingness prohibiting any further linguistic development whatsoever the terms 'siesta' 'plateau' and 'permanent optionality' on the other hand consider the concept to be negotiable in some sense holding an option of resuming linguistic development. In this paper I will very briefly outline some of the major