Fall of Fort Eben Emael

<p>This study details the events of 10 May 1940 at Fort Eben Emael Belgium and the elements which led to the successful seizure of the fort by the German military. The central focus of this thesis is the following question. Was the use of emerging technologies the key to victory at Fort Eben Emael? First the study focuses on the technologies themselves. Secondly this study examines the leadership and training of the German unit assigned the mission at Fort Eben Emael. Lastly this study examines administration and personnel issues that existed for the Belgians stationed at Fort Eben Emael. This study determined that the glider did afford troops the advantage of surprise; however the hollow charge failed to live up to its reputation as it was most effective when used in such a way that it was no different than a conventional charge. Further the German unit's training and leadership was exemplary and contributed more to the mission's success than the technologies the unit employed. Additionally Fort Eben Emael was faced with serious internal issues that prevented a successful defense of the fort. Therefore this thesis concludes that emerging technologies were not the most crucial component contributing to mission success.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p><br>