Finance and Economics Discussion Series

<p>I identify and quantify the mortgage supply effect of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) a law mandating that banks help provide credit in lower-income neighborhoods by exploiting a discontinuity in the selection rule determining which census tracts CRA targets. Using a comprehensive source of micro data on MSA mortgage applications I find that CRA affects bank lending primarily in large MSA's where banks are most scrutinized. The analysis indicates that CRA's effect on bank originations was about 4% between 1994 and 1996 and expanded to 8% in 1997-2002 consistent with the timing of a reform strengthening CRA. I provide some evidence that marginal loans go to atypical potentially higher-risk borrowers. The results also indicate net crowd-in: lending to targeted tracts by unregulated institutions rises in post-reform years in particular to those areas that have had relatively low home purchase volume in the recent past consistent with a model of information externalities in credit markets. Finally using changes in tract eligibility status following the release of Census 2000 data as an additional source of variation I find that CRA increased bank lending to newly targeted tracts in large MSA's by 4-5% in 2004 and 2005.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p>