Freedom and Responsibility in Neoplatonist Thought

The Neoplatonists have a perfectionist view of freedom: an entity is free to the extent that it succeeds in making itself good. Free entities are wholly in control of themselves--they are self-determining self-constituting and self-knowing. Neoplatonist philosophers argue that such freedom<br>is only possible for non-bodily things. The human soul is free insofar as it rises above bodily things and engages in intellection but when it turns its desires to bodily things it is drawn under the sway of fate and becomes enslaved. Ursula Coope discusses this notion of freedom and its relation<br>to questions about responsibility. She explains the important role of notions of self-reflexivity in Neoplatonist accounts of both freedom and responsibility. In Part I Coope sets out the puzzles Neoplatonist philosophers face about freedom and responsibility and explains how these puzzles arise<br>from earlier discussions. Part II explores the metaphysical underpinnings of the Neoplatonist notion of freedom (concentrating especially on the views of Plotinus and Proclus). In what sense if any is the ultimate first principle of everything (the One) free? If everything else is under this<br>ultimate first principle how can anything other than the One be free? What is the connection between freedom and nonbodiliness? Finally Coope considers in Part III questions about responsibility arising from this perfectionist view of freedom. Why are human beings responsible for their behaviour <br>in a way that other animals are not? If we are enslaved when we act viciously how can we be to blame for our vicious actions and choices?