Geo-Economics of Global Industrial Agricultural Development Models

The global nature of the agricultural industry has seen substantial modifications as a result of industrialization and commercialization. Since its inception in the mid-20th century industrial agriculture has been promoted to the public as a technological marvel. Its philosophy is its efficiency would enable food production and its economies of scale would ensure profitable farming. The present paper analyzes the global countries UNO World Bank IMF WTO and MNCs TNCs philanthropic corporate industrial agricultural models and their nature and suggests policies for profitable models for the globe. The results of global countries models show that USA-Industrial Agricultural Canada-Value-added Production Industrial Agriculture Mexico- Commercial Agriculture Brazil- Integrated Farming an Low Carbon Farming UK- Mechanized & Industrial agriculture models Germany- Smart Farming Switzerland-Organic Farming Russia-Market oriented models Sweden-Modern farming models Australia-Conservation Farming India-IFS Model China Intensive farming Models South Africa- Dual agriculture economy MNC's TNC's-Global Corporate Farming Models. World Bank: Global markets via value-chains originating in industrial agriculture IMF: International partnership for sustainable development WTO: global partnership Model UNO: inclusive business models in Agriculture and Food systems for sustainability UN ESCAP and Billgate: inclusive business models partnership in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. The study suggests adopting Russian contract farming joint venture corporate models which minimize the resource constraints advanced technologies adoption and linking global supply chains for small farms in Asia and Africa. IMF and World Bank are practiced cooperation WTO to include cooperation with the UN system OECD and other international partners. MNC's TNC's- Global Corporate Farming Models transparency accountability crucial to ensure responsible corporate behavior.