<p>Rev. Daniel Zwier wrote a series of articles in the 1930s that attempted to defend the first point of common grace adopted by the Christian Reformed synod in 1924.&nbsp; Rev. Zwier charged that Rev. Herman Hoeksema and those who followed him were guilty of rationalism faulty exegesis and bad theology.</p><p>Zwier claimed to set forth a &ldquo;triple cord&rdquo; of texts that spoke clearly in support of a goodness of God to the ungodly reprobate.&nbsp; This goodness consisted in God&rsquo;s giving the wicked good gifts such as rain sunshine and fruitful seasons.&nbsp; Zwier&rsquo;s purpose with these texts was to fashion a triple cord of scriptural proof for the doctrine of common grace that could not be broken.</p><p>Hoeksema gives Zwier a spirited response. He pulls no punches.&nbsp; Hoeksema shows the modern reader and writer the proper and biblical way to be polemical when God&rsquo;s honor is at stake and the Reformed faith is being attacked. Hoeksema did not back down from controversy.</p><p>What does the Bible teach regarding God&rsquo;s attitude to the reprobate ungodly?&nbsp; What are the implications that God has an attitude of favor to the wicked?&nbsp; Do the Psalms support or give the lie to the theory of common grace? Does Zwier&rsquo;s triple cord hold firm or is it cut to ribbons?</p><p>Hoeksema shows clearly that God&rsquo;s love and favor are for his elect whom he has redeemed in Christ.&nbsp; As for those outside of Christ the wrath of God abides on them. Read and gain new appreciation for the truth that God&rsquo;s goodness is always particular.</p>
Piracy-free
Assured Quality
Secure Transactions
Delivery Options
Please enter pincode to check delivery time.
*COD & Shipping Charges may apply on certain items.