Google Archipelago: The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom


LOOKING TO PLACE A BULK ORDER?CLICK HERE

Piracy-free
Piracy-free
Assured Quality
Assured Quality
Secure Transactions
Secure Transactions
Fast Delivery
Fast Delivery
Sustainably Printed
Sustainably Printed
Delivery Options
Please enter pincode to check delivery time.
*COD & Shipping Charges may apply on certain items.
Review final details at checkout.

About The Book

Google Archipelago: The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom begins with familiar cultural politics as points of entry to the books theme regarding the reach penetration and soon the ubiquity of the digital world. In a book about enormous sea changes brought about by digital technology Google Archipelago begins and ends with the political in particular with the objectives of the Big Digi­tal conglomerates as global corporate monopoly capitalists or would-be-monopolies.Google Archipelago argues that Big Digital technologies and their principals represent not only economic powerhouses but also new forms of governmental power. The technologies of Big Digital not only amplify extend and lend precision to the powers of the state they may represent elements of a new corporate state power.In contrast to academics who study digital media and bemoan such supposed horrors as digital exploitation in Google Archipelago Michael Rectenwald argues that the real danger posed by Big Digital is not digital capitalism as such but leftist authoritarianism a political outlook shared by academic leftists who thus cannot recognize it in their object of study. Thus while imagining that they are radical critics of Big Digital academic digital media scholars (whom Rectenwald terms the digitalistas) actually serve as ideological smokescreens that obscure its real character.Two chapters interrupt the books genre as non-fiction prose. Part historical science fiction and part memoir these chapters render the story of a Soviet Gu­lag survivor and defector and the authors earlier digital self. Google Archipelago intentionally blurs the lines between argument and story fact and artifact the real and the imaginary. This is necessary Rectenwald argues because one cannot pretend to describe the Google Archipelago as if from without as something apart from experience. In any case soon one will no longer go on the Internet. The Internet and cyberspace will be everywhere while humans and other agents will be digital artifacts within it.The Google Archipelago represents the coextension of digitization and physical social space the conversion of social space and its inhabitants into digital artifacts and the potential to control populations to degrees unimagined by the likes of Stalin Hitler or Mao.
downArrow

Details