The Final Curtain

<p>Sixty years ago a small time thief James Hanratty with no history of violent crime was hanged for a motiveless and horrific murder but vital evidence withheld from the original trial indicated that he might have been wrongly executed. </p><p>His defence counsel couldn't take it in that this evidence had been concealed. </p><p>At the same time new DNA discoveries by forensic scientists told a very different story. </p><p>If the interpretation of the DNA was right then James Hanratty was guilty but if other new evidence kept secret from the trial was right then he might be innocent. </p><p>What is the truth in this case? </p><p>Was he innocent or guilty? </p><p>Is this DNA evidence a cover up for the British government? </p><p>Is this the final curtain on the James Hanratty case? </p><p>What is your opinion after reading this book?</p>