<p>Landlord villages dominated Iranian land tenure for hundreds of years, whereby one powerful landlord owned the village structures, surrounding farmland, and to all intents and purposes, the village occupants themselves, a system that in some cases remained in place up to the 1979 Islamic Revolution. In Oman, mud-brick oases were home to most of the rural population right up until Sultan Qaboos came to power in 1970, and required inhabitants of mud-brick houses to relocate into new concrete block buildings. </p><p></p><p><i>Historical Archaeology and Heritage in the Middle East</i> explores these everyday, rural communities in Iran and Oman in the 19th and 20th centuries, through a combination of building analysis, excavation, artefact analysis and ethnographic interviews. Drawing on the results of original field projects, the book considers new ways of exploring traditional lifeways, giving voice to hitherto largely ignored sections of the population, and offers new and different ways of thinking about how these people lived and what shaped their lives and the impact of major political and social changes on them. Place, memory and belonging are considered through the lens of material culture within these villages.</p><p></p><p>The first of its kind, the book brings together methodologies, research questions, and themes that have never been used or addressed in the Middle East. Helping to establish historical archaeology in the Middle East and providing new ways in which the memorable, quotidian past can be exploited for its social and economic value in contemporary community and heritage developments, it is an ideal resource for students, scholars and practitioners of historical archaeology and heritage of and in the Middle East.</p> <p><em>List of Figures</em></p><p></p><p><em>Acknowledgements</em></p><p></p><p><em>Notes on the Identification of Interviewees</em></p><p></p><p>1 <b>Introduction</b></p><p></p><p>The aims of this book</p><p></p><p>Key concepts in this book: place, memory, belonging</p><p></p><p>Heritage</p><p></p><p>The case studies</p><p></p><p> The Iran project: Landlord Villages of the Tehran Plain</p><p></p><p> Landlord villages of Iran</p><p></p><p> Post revolution villages</p><p></p><p> The Oman project: Bat Oasis Heritage Project</p><p></p><p> Oman villages of the interior</p><p></p><p> Housing changes in Oman</p><p></p><p>Conclusion</p><p></p><p>2 <b>Recent histories of Iran and Oman</b></p><p></p><p>An outline of recent Iranian History</p><p></p><p>An outline of recent Omani history</p><p></p><p>Nation building, heritage, and place</p><p></p><p> Iran: nation building by the Pahlavis</p><p></p><p> Oman: nation building by Sultan Qaboos</p><p></p><p>Conclusion</p><p></p><p>3 <b>An archaeology of place and memory</b></p><p></p><p>Archaeology is a way of understanding how people make place</p><p></p><p>The village plans</p><p></p><p>Place and power </p><p></p><p>Giving meaning to place </p><p></p><p>Place and religion</p><p></p><p>Public places</p><p></p><p>Place and memory</p><p></p><p>Post abandonment</p><p></p><p> Landlord villages</p><p></p><p> Bat Oasis</p><p></p><p>Conclusion</p><p></p><p>4 <b>Memory, place and belonging</b></p><p></p><p>Place, archaeology and memory</p><p></p><p>Place and belonging under attack</p><p></p><p>Mudbrick and memory in Oman</p><p></p><p>Mudbrick and memory in Iran </p><p></p><p> Kazemabad and Hosseinabad Sanghar memories </p><p></p><p> Gach Agach memories</p><p></p><p>Discussion and conclusion</p><p></p><p>5 <b>Heritage in the Middle East</b> </p><p></p><p>Heritage</p><p></p><p>UNESCO World Heritage in relation to the Middle East </p><p></p><p>Why is the Bat prehistoric archaeological landscape a WH site and not the Bat Oasis?</p><p></p><p>Heritage in the Middle East</p><p></p><p>National heritage in Oman</p><p></p><p>National heritage in Iran</p><p></p><p>Quotidian and fragmented heritage</p><p></p><p>Conclusion</p><p></p><p>6 <b>Historical archaeology and heritage in the Middle East</b></p><p></p><p>Barriers to historical archaeologySo how should we go about setting up ‘good’ heritage and archaeology projects?</p><p></p><p>Community involvement </p><p></p><p>Conclusion</p><p><em>Bibliography</em></p><p></p><p><em>Index</em></p>