Justice

<p>This monograph directly addresses the problem posed when considering the question 'Who says what right is?'; or 'Justice according to whom?'; The relative nature of the term 'justice' creates a problem for military ethics particularly when soldiers try to determine what actions are morally acceptable while engaged in irregular war. This problem prompted a distinct way of thinking about 'justice' to form over the course of history called the Just War Tradition. However instead of encouraging ethical reflection Just War Tradition has today caused military ethics to drift toward legalism. What can stop this slide into strict formalism where law eclipses ethics? The research conducted for this monograph has led the author to believe that the answer lies in a philosophical current called personalism which has synthesized the Aristotelian and Kantian positions. Simply stated personalism promotes empathetic reflection prior to acting. Personalism does this by emphasizing the equal dignity of human beings an idea that is particularly salient to irregular war. During irregular war military actions are intended to win over the civilian population. The value therefore of adopting a personalist ethic is not only moral but also pragmatic guiding irregular warfare closer to success.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p>