Lisrel Issues Debates and Strategies

<p><i>LISREL: Issues Debates and Strategies</i> examines issues of concern to researchers already familiar with the basics of structural equation modeling. Building on his earlier work in <i>Structural Equation Modeling in LISREL</i> Leslie Hayduk explains procedures that maximize researchers' control over the meanings of their concepts and integrates the modeling of single and multiple indicators. The constraints and deceptions of the factor model are used to highlight measurement issues and the debate over whether one should estimate a measurement model prior to estimating a structural model is reviewed extended and evaluated.</p><p>For sociologists political scientists psychologists and researchers in science medicine and education <i>LISREL</i> offers a wealth of useful information: </p><p> A loop-equivalent to the standard recursive model is presented as grounding an interpretation style that can be used to challenge any or all the effect estimates from recursive models. (Loop-equivalent provide an appealing alternative conceptualization of longitudinal processes.)</p><p> Models with acceptable negative <i>R2</i>'s are discussed and <i>LAR2</i> is introduced as a more appropriate indication of error variance for variables touching reciprocal relationships or loops. The logic connecting partial correlations tetrads equivalent models and LISREL is presented and recent advances in this area are reviewed.</p><p> Phantom variables and a modeling trick combine to illustrate how stacked models based on differing sets of indicator variables can be used: to identify otherwise unidentified models to control for unmeasured variables and to integrate models based on diverse data sets.</p><p> A more appropriate Monte-Carlo-test model is proposed and a brief review of the recent literature is provided.</p>