Lynching

<p>While victims of antebellum lynchings were typically white men postbellum lynchings became more frequent and more intense with the victims more often black. After Reconstruction lynchings exhibited and embodied links between violent collective action American civic identity and the making of the nation.</p><p>Ersula J. Ore investigates lynching as a racialized practice of civic engagement in effect an argument against black inclusion within the changing nation. Ore scrutinizes the civic roots of lynching the relationship between lynching and white constitutionalism and contemporary manifestations of lynching discourse and logic today. From the 1880s onward lynchings she finds manifested a violent form of symbolic action that called a national public into existence denoted citizenship and upheld political community.</p><p>Grounded in Ida B. Wells's summation of lynching as a social contract among whites to maintain a racial order at its core Ore's book speaks to racialized violence as a mode of civic engagement. Since violence enacts an argument about citizenship Ore construes lynching and its expressions as part and parcel of America's rhetorical tradition and political legacy.</p><p>Drawing upon newspapers official records and memoirs as well as critical race theory Ore outlines the connections between what was said and written the material practices of lynching in the past and the forms these rhetorics and practices assume now. In doing so she demonstrates how lynching functioned as a strategy interwoven with the formation of America's national identity and with the nation's need to continually restrict and redefine that identity. In addition Ore ties black resistance to lynching the acclaimed exhibit Without Sanctuary recent police brutality effigies of Barack Obama and the killing of Trayvon Martin.</p>