MADHYAMAKALAMKARAVRITTI
English


LOOKING TO PLACE A BULK ORDER?CLICK HERE

Piracy-free
Piracy-free
Assured Quality
Assured Quality
Secure Transactions
Secure Transactions
Fast Delivery
Fast Delivery
Sustainably Printed
Sustainably Printed
Delivery Options
Please enter pincode to check delivery time.
*COD & Shipping Charges may apply on certain items.
Review final details at checkout.

About The Book

<p class=ql-align-center><em>Scripture without a logic that is based on </em></p><p class=ql-align-center><em> the evidence of things will not satisfy</em></p><p class=ql-align-center><em>even faithful followers.</em> </p><p class=ql-align-center>                     -Shantarakshita</p><p class=ql-align-justify>Shantarakshita follows in the footsteps of Buddha Shakyamuni who stated that no one should accept his view without testing it as a goldsmith tests gold. In this seminal 8th century text he deconstructs illucidates and defends Madhayamaka as the essence and central philosophical bases of Mahayana as elaborated by Nagurjuna-which work preceded the advent of a Buddhist age over much of Asia for a 1000 years. It's tenets still remains relevant today with discoveries and inventions based on science investigating the 'nature' of nature.</p><p class=ql-align-justify>In the <em>Madhyamakalamkaravritti</em> his commentary on his root text <em>The Adornment of the Middle Way</em> Shantarakshita aims to completely clarify the position that while ultimately reality eludes our comprehension conventional knowledge is useful as a tool for navigating appearances all of which are no more real than the reflection of the moon in water.</p><p class=ql-align-justify>Shantarakshita's motivation for this radical destruction of our basic and cherished beliefs is to liberate us from anything that can cause us suffering. If we cling to our illusory world it will fail us because it is impermanent.</p><p class=ql-align-justify>In sloka 16 Shantarakshita does make one positive assertion about reality when he asserts self-awareness. But he is careful not to become trapped in the classic Buddhist model of subject object and activity. Self-awareness he argues cannot be understood in this way. Subject and object are not distinct nor identical not one not many. Self-awareness has no substantial existence.</p><p><br></p>
downArrow

Details