*COD & Shipping Charges may apply on certain items.
Review final details at checkout.
₹1644
All inclusive*
Qty:
1
About The Book
Description
Author
<p><em>melancholy occurrence</em> is the latest in a series of texts through which John Seed investigates the appropriation and reconfiguring of historical materials. Previous volumes in the series include <em>Pictures from Mayhew</em> (Shearsman 2005) about which Allen Fisher said: &lsquo;The substance of this work is astonishing vivid felt with a considerable and sensitive intelligence.&rsquo; Its successor <em>That Barrikins</em> (Shearsman 2007) was commended by Iain Sinclair for its &lsquo;reverse archaeology&rsquo;: &lsquo;His close ear and neurotic sensitivity to the way a line breaks reveals how in the desperate grind of the city confession aspires to the condition of song.&rsquo; And David Caddy commented on the most recent <em>Brandon Pithouse</em> (Smokestack 2016): &lsquo;The singular fragments juxtaposed and in disjunction accumulate to produce a deeply moving montage of statistics and documentary experience. The rhythms and cadence of the vernacular emerge in both pain and humour&hellip;&rsquo; (<em>Tears in the Fence</em> 2016).</p><p><em>melancholy occurrences </em>: accidents and disasters random events contingencies chance coincidence everything that a Western propensity for generalisation explanation and meaning pushes to the margins. These are we might almost say moments of an anti-novel brief narratives in a larger anti-narrative. They certainly owe something to a sustained reading of the <em>nouveau roman</em> and in particular the wonderful (and neglected) writing of Claude Simon.</p><p>Elective affinities to Roland Barthes are also signalled from the beginning especially his reflections on how the haiku resists interpretation. It is intelligible and means nothing: &lsquo;The haiku&rsquo;s task is to achieve exemption from meaning within a perfectly readerly discourse (a contradiction denied to Western art which can contest meaning only by rendering its discourse incomprehensible)&hellip;&rsquo; (<em>Empire of Signs</em> 1982).</p>