misReading Nietzsche

Perhaps more than any philosophy written in the past few centuries the work of Friedrich Nietzsche has given rise to controversy misunderstanding and dissent. Today Nietzsche is remembered as the revolutionary author of such polemical ideas as the death of God the revaluation of values the will to untruth and the Ubermensch. Yet is Nietzsches philosophy as atheistic relativistic nihilistic and immoral as some commentators have claimed? Or ought we perhaps to give more credence to Nietzsches own assertion that one writes books precisely to conceal what one harbors (BGE 9 289)?If whatever is profound loves masks (BGE 2 40) then might Nietzsches more daring claims be interpreted as clever masks behind which he conceals a deeper philosophy and on which he reveals a hidden truth? Is it not possible that the standard readings of Nietzsche are in fact misreadings--that his work invites misreading that it is intentionally unclear deceptive disguised?The goal of this volume is to reread Nietzsche for all that he shows and all that he hides. It is to dig deeper into his work in order to challenge misreadings of old and invite misreadings anew--as indeed his work itself calls for and demands.