Modal Logic as Metaphysics
English


LOOKING TO PLACE A BULK ORDER?CLICK HERE

Piracy-free
Piracy-free
Assured Quality
Assured Quality
Secure Transactions
Secure Transactions
Fast Delivery
Fast Delivery
Sustainably Printed
Sustainably Printed
Delivery Options
Please enter pincode to check delivery time.
*COD & Shipping Charges may apply on certain items.
Review final details at checkout.

About The Book

Are there such things as merely possible people who would have lived if our ancestors had acted differently? Are there future people who have not yet been conceived? Questions like those raise deep issues about both the nature of being and its logical relations with contingency and change. In Modal Logic as Metaphysics Timothy Williamson argues for positive answers to those questions on the basis of an integrated approach to the issues applying the technical resources of modal logic to provide structural cores for metaphysical theories. He rejects the search for a metaphysically neutral logic as futile. The book contains detailed historical discussion of how the metaphysical issues emerged in the twentieth century development of quantified modal logic through the work of such figures as Rudolf Carnap Ruth Barcan Marcus Arthur Prior and Saul Kripke. It proposes higher-order modal logic as a new setting in which to resolve such metaphysical questions scientifically by the construction of systematic logical theories embodying rival answers and their comparison by normal scientific standards. Williamson provides both a rigorous introduction to the technical background needed to understand metaphysical questions in quantified modal logic and an extended argument for controversial provocative answers to them. He gives original precise treatments of topics including the relation between logic and metaphysics the methodology of theory choice in philosophy the nature of possible worlds and their role in semantics plural quantification compared to quantification into predicate position communication across metaphysical disagreement and problems for truthmaker theory.
downArrow

Details