New Directions in Assessing Historical Thinking

<p>New technologies have radically transformed our relationship to information in general and to little bits of information in particular. The assessment of history learning, which for a century has valued those little bits as the centerpiece of its practice, now faces not only an unprecedented glut but a disconnect with what is valued in history education. More complex processes—historical thinking, historical consciousness or historical sense making—demand more complex assessments. At the same time, advances in scholarship on assessment open up new possibilities. </p><p>For this volume, Kadriye Ercikan and Peter Seixas have assembled an international array of experts who have, collectively, moved the fields of history education and assessment forward. Their various approaches negotiate the sometimes-conflicting demands of theoretical sophistication, empirically demonstrated validity and practical efficiency. Key issues include articulating the cognitive goals of history education, the relationship between content and procedural knowledge, the impact of students’ language literacy on history assessments, and methods of validation in both large scale and classroom assessments. <i>New Directions in Assessing Historical Thinking</i> is a critical, research-oriented resource that will advance the conceptualization, design and validation of the next generation of history assessments.</p> <p>Preface</p><p>Acknowledgements</p><p>Contributor Biographies</p><p>Introduction</p><p>Part I: Goals of History Education: Models of Historical Cognition and Learning</p><p>1 Historical Consciousness in Germany: Concept, Implementation, Assessment</p><p>Carlos Kölbl & Lisa Konrad</p><p>2 The Difficulty of Assessing Disciplinary Historical Reading</p><p>Abby Reisman</p><p>3 Heritage as a Resource for Enhancing and Assessing Historical Thinking: Reflections from the Netherlands</p><p>Carla van Boxtel, Maria Grever & Stephan Klein</p><p>4 Relating Historical Consciousness to Historical Thinking through Assessment</p><p>Catherine Duquette</p><p>Commentary 1 Into the Swampy Lowlands of Important Problems</p><p>Robert B. Bain</p><p>Part 2: Issues in Designing Assessments of Historical Thinking</p><p>5 Assessing for Learning in the History Classroom </p><p>Bruce VanSledright</p><p>6 Historical Thinking, Competencies and their Measurement: Challenges and Approaches</p><p>Andreas Körber & Johannes Meyer-Hamme</p><p>7 A Design Process for Assessing Historical Thinking: The Case of a One-Hour Test</p><p>Peter Seixas, Lindsay Gibson & Kadriye Ercikan</p><p>8 Material-based and Open-ended Writing Tasks for Assessing Narrative Competence among Students</p><p>Monika Waldis, Jan Hodel, Holger Thünemann, Meik Zülsdorf-Kersting, & Beatrice Ziegler</p><p>Commentary 2 Historical Thinking: In Search of Conceptual and Practical Guidance for the Design and Use of Assessments of Student Competence</p><p>Josh Radinsky, Susan R. Goldman, James W. Pellegrino </p><p>Part 3: Large-scale Assessment of Historical Thinking </p><p>9 A Large-Scale Assessment of Historical Knowledge and Reasoning: NAEP U.S. History</p><p>Stephen Lazer</p><p>10 Assessing Historical Thinking in the Redesigned Advanced Placement United States History Course and Exam</p><p>Lawrence G. Charap</p><p>11 Historical Consciousness and Historical Thinking Reflected in Large-scale Assessment in Sweden</p><p>Per Eliasson, Fredrik Alvén, Cecilia Axelsson Yngvéus, & David Rosenlund</p><p>Commentary 3 Assessment of Historical Thinking in Practice</p><p>Susan M. Brookhart</p><p>Part 4: Validity of Score Interpretations</p><p>12 The Importance of Construct Validity Evidence in History Assessment: What is Often Overlooked or Misunderstood?</p><p>Pamela Kaliski, Kara Smith, & Kristen Huff</p><p>13 Cognitive Validity Evidence for Validating Assessments of Historical Thinking</p><p>Kadriye Ercikan, Peter Seixas, Juliette Lyons-Thomas, & Lindsay Gibson</p><p>14 Measuring Up?: Multiple-Choice Questions</p><p>Gabriel A. Reich</p><p>15 History Assessments of Thinking: An Investigation of Cognitive Validity</p><p>Mark Smith & Joel Breakstone</p><p>Commentary 4 The Validity of Historical Thinking Assessments: A Commentary </p><p><i>Denis Shemilt</i></p>