No Magic Wand
shared
This Book is Out of Stock!

About The Book

Since 1993 Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science however some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners while others reject reliable evidence that is unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between undue deference and undeserved skepticism Caudill and LaRue draw on the philosophy of science to help judges juries and advocates better understand its goals and limitations.
Piracy-free
Piracy-free
Assured Quality
Assured Quality
Secure Transactions
Secure Transactions
*COD & Shipping Charges may apply on certain items.
Review final details at checkout.
4760
6515
26% OFF
Paperback
Out Of Stock
All inclusive*
downArrow

Details


LOOKING TO PLACE A BULK ORDER?CLICK HERE