On the Theory of Unnatural Unnaturalness Becoming Natural Unnaturalness

An assessment of postnihilism's probabilities through reaffirmation of nihilism's and prenihilism's definitions <I>On the Theory of Unnatural Unnaturalness Becoming Natural Unnaturalness</I> reverberates the radical thought that anti-foundationalism is the most tangible proof of the existence of a beyond.</p><p>Certainly a disappointed idealism resulting in destructiveness is an ongoing happening present since the founding of civilization. Never have two penultimate demonstrations of it been placed side by side like nihilism and its variation anti-foundationalism. Both use a general state of unhappiness for the purposes of indoctrination-only anti-foundationalism is slightly quieter bringing a new level of subtlety.</p><p>Friedrich Nietzsche always found beauty in nihilism a radical position itself. Never has it crossed the minds of those who abhor his doctrines that it is an opinion that supports none of the fascist ends-that what he really meant to demonstrate was that only prenihilism can be a root of nihilism that nihilism can never be a creator of itself. The purpose of author Mihajlo Bugarinovic's <I>On the Theory of Unnatural Unnaturalness Becoming Natural Unnaturalness</I> is to clear the name of one the greatest thinkers of our time to put his importance in a new context.