Overcoming Inertia

<p>Numerous studies have concluded that the United States Government needs more people who are competent at working across traditional agency boundaries. However not everyone has agreed upon the best method for developing this necessary 'human capital.' In order to supply such a method this paper analyzes past work investigates ongoing efforts and develops various models to boost the number of interagency specialists. The conclusion is that the government should adopt a phased approach to its problem. In the short-term phase the government needs to build upon current human capital initiatives that show promise protecting these efforts from endless attempts to refine them. Current programs could be broadened without dulling their effectiveness enabling the government to generate human capital until its second phase matures. This second longer-term phase should be the development of a truly independent corps of interagency experts essentially a new bureaucratic structure within the government in accordance with the recent recommendations of the Project on National Security Reform. The combination of these two phases should alleviate much of the friction plaguing the government leading to greater interagency effectiveness both abroad and at home.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p>