Perceived Fairness of an Ethnic Validation Procedure

Procedures are used today in all areas of life including business education politics and as in this study to determine a group's ethnicity. American Indians are the only ethnic group that must petition to the United States government to validate legally their ethnicity. The purpose of the current study was to explore the effects of social exclusion threat negative affect on the evaluated fairness of a procedure that functions to validate ethnic membership using the Dimensional Voice Model (Bane 1994). Participants consisted of 120 (60 = female 60 = male) college students. The study design was a 2 (Gender) X 2 (Justification) X 3 (Procedure) factorial between-groups experimental design. Based on social exclusion theory individuals may experience high levels of negative affect when they perceive a threat of exclusion from a group (Baumeister & Tice 1990). It was hypothesized that a procedure designed to validate ethnic mem­bership will result in social exclusion threat negative affect. A procedure designed to validate ethnic membership was hypothesized as being evaluated as un­fair (Thibaut Walker LaTour & Houlden 1974; Lind & Tyler 1988; Tyler 1990 1994; Tyler & Lind 1994; Walker LaTour Lind & Thibaut 1974). Justifications (Bies 1987a 1987b 1989; Bies & Moag 1986; Bies & Shapiro 1987 1988; Brotheridge 2003; Skarlicki Folger & Gee 2004) before the procedure was tested as the rationale for the procedure introduced as procedural justification. Of two procedural justi­fi­ca­tions the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the National Science Foun­da­tion (NSF) the National Science Foundation (NSF) justification was hypothesized as being per­ceived fairer. The results suggest that procedures designed to validate ethnic mem­bership were evaluated as unfair. Additionally the results indicated that pro­ce­dural justifications might affect perceptions of fairness of the procedure. The data strongly supports the notion that these procedures may create an environment of ne­gative af­fect with respondents evaluating the procedures as unfair. Implications for Lumbee Federal Recognition are discussed.