Politics: A Treatise on Government

The Politics of Aristotle is the second part of a treatise of which the Ethics is the first part. It looks back to the Ethics as the Ethics looks forward to the Politics. For Aristotle did not separate as we are inclined to do the spheres of the statesman and the moralist. In the Ethics he has described the character necessary for the good life but that life is for him essentially to be lived in society and when in the last chapters of the Ethics he comes to the practical application of his inquiries that finds expression not in moral exhortations addressed to the individual but in a description of the legislative opportunities of the statesman. It is the legislators task to frame a society which shall make the good life possible. Politics for Aristotle is not a struggle between individuals or classes for power nor a device for getting done such elementary tasks as the maintenance of order and security without too great encroachments on individual liberty. The state is a community of well-being in families and aggregations of families for the sake of a perfect and self-sufficing life. The legislator is a craftsman whose material is society and whose aim is the good life.In an early dialogue of Platos the Protagoras Socrates asks Protagoras why it is not as easy to find teachers of virtue as it is to find teachers of swordsmanship riding or any other art. Protagoras answer is that there are no special teachers of virtue because virtue is taught by the whole community. Plato and Aristotle both accept the view of moral education implied in this answer. In a passage of the Republic (492 b) Plato repudiates the notion that the sophists have a corrupting moral influence upon young men. The public themselves he says are the real sophists and the most complete and thorough educators. No private education can hold out against the irresistible force of public opinion and the ordinary moral standards of society. But that makes it all the more essential that public opinion and social environment should not be left to grow up at haphazard as they ordinarily do but should be made by the wise legislator the expression of the good and be informed in all their details by his knowledge. The legislator is the only possible teacher of virtue.Such a programme for a treatise on government might lead us to expect in the Politics mainly a description of a Utopia or ideal state which might inspire poets or philosophers but have little direct effect upon political institutions. Platos Republic is obviously impracticable for its author had turned away in despair from existing politics. He has no proposals in that dialogue at least for making the best of things as they are. The first lesson his philosopher has to learn is to turn away from this world of becoming and decay and to look upon the unchanging eternal world of ideas. Thus his ideal city is as he says a pattern laid up in heaven by which the just man may rule his life a pattern therefore in the meantime for the individual and not for the statesman. It is a city he admits in the Laws for gods or the children of gods not for men as they are.