Rationality in Politics and Its Limits

<p>The word 'rationality' and its cognates like 'reason' have multiple contexts and connotations. Rational calculation can be contrasted with rational interpretation. There is the rationality of proof and of persuasion of tradition and of the criticism of tradition. Rationalism (and rationalists) can be reasonable or unreasonable. Reason is sometimes distinguished from revelation superstition convention prejudice emotion and chance but all of these also involve reasoning. In politics three views of rationality - economic moral and historical - have been especially important often defining approaches to politics and political theory such as utilitarianism and rational choice theory. These approaches privilege positive or natural law responsibilities or human rights and emphasize the importance of culture and tradition and therefore meaning and context. </p><p>This book explores the understanding of rationality in politics and the relations between different approaches to rationality. Among the topics considered are the limits of rationality the role of imagination and emotion in politics the meaning of political realism the nature of political judgment and the relationship between theory and practice. This book was originally published as a special issue of <i>Global Discourse. </i></p>