Size Matters

<p>While the literature on the size of small groups and teams is extensive there is little research on design team sizes and no formal research or analysis on the size of a military design team. This monograph investigates the optimal team size and composition for the military design team. The monograph is a multidisciplinary survey that draws from design theory organization theory leadership theory social psychology psychology and anthropology. The results of the survey indicate that the ideal size of a military design team is five to six people; however the team can be effective up to a size of nine. The findings also demonstrate that 20 team members create an inefficient team. The use of cross-functional or X-team structures provides a basis for the team structure and composition. The military design team will most likely be cross-functional in some manner due to the diverse educational background of its members and the joint and combined nature of military operations and organizations. However the use of the X-team structure holds the most potential due to its external focus. This enables the design team to leverage resources external to the team and develop a design concept that provides best fit to their unique operational context.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p>