Staff Responsibility to Help the Commander Develop his Vision

<p>This monograph explores how the military battle staff helps the commander develop his vision. The researcher examined how the staff provides information to the commander using the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP). The study then shows how the commander visualizes the battlefield using criteria of know the enemy know the terrain know yourself and see the future. The Battle of the Black Sea Mogadishu Somalia October 3rd 1993 is used as a Case Study to determine what was the common shared understanding of the commander and staff. The monograph concludes that the commander initializes a common understanding by giving the staff the problem before mission analysis. The staff then is challenged to provide solutions to the commander's problem using an integrated staff system. The staff works as a system to filter information through a set of criteria to discover strengths and weaknesses of both the enemy and friendly units. Those strengths and weaknesses are then synthesized using a reverse battlefield operating system technique to provide the commander a picture of every feasible solution to the problem. Those feasible solutions then allow the commander to apply his experience to develop his vision for success.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p>