Taking Frege at His Word

Frege is widely regarded as having set much of the agenda of contemporary analytic philosophy. As standardly read he meant to introduce--and make crucial contributions to--the project of giving an account of the workings of (an improved version of) natural language. Yet despite the great admiration most contemporary philosophers feel for Frege it is widely believed that he committed a large number of serious and inexplicable blunders. For if Frege really meant to be constructing a theory of the workings of (some version of) natural language then a significant number of his stated views--including views that he claimed to be central to his philosophical picture--are straightforwardly wrong. But did Frege mean to be giving an account of the workings of language? He himself never actually claimed to be doing this and indeed never even described such a project. <p/><em>Taking Frege at his Word</em> offers an interpretation that is based on a different approach to his writings. Rather than using the contributions he is taken to have made to contemporary work in the philosophy of language to infer what his projects were Joan Weiner gives priority to Frege's own accounts of what he means to be doing. She provides a very different view of Frege's project. One might suspect that on such a reading Frege's writings would have purely antiquarian interest but this would be a mistake. The final two chapters show that Frege offers us new ways of addressing some of the philosophical problems that worry us today.<br>