陆权与海权的角逐 The Competition between Land Power and Sea Power

《草原帝国》的名称远远不及《内陆帝国》来得贴切--因为这些帝国不仅占据了草原， 而且占有了农业地区甚至沿海地区。从海权和陆权的角度看， 它们的性格都是内陆的而非海洋的， 也不是中国、印度、阿拉伯那样的。它们的崛起和没落， 更能揭示陆权与海权的角逐， 有助于展开我们的思考和论述。如果说， 蒙古人、土耳其人也算文明的话， 那么邹容所说的披毛戴角之满洲种也可以算作文明的野蛮人了--难怪偏偏贩子英国鬼子要和满洲鬼子进行交易呢。印欧人想要脱贫了， 想要摘掉雅利安野蛮入侵者的帽子。但是古代印度的文明难道不是被他们摧毁了的吗。Executive summaryThe name Prairie Empire is far less appropriate than Inland Empire - because these empires not only occupied the grasslands but also occupied agricultural areas and even coastal areas. From the perspective of sea power and land power their characters are inland rather than oceanic nor are they like China India or Arabia. Their rise and decline can better reveal the competition between land power and sea power and help expand our thinking and discussion.If the Mongols and Turks can also be considered civilized then the haired and horned Manchus mentioned by Zou Rong can also be regarded as civilized barbarians - no wonder the trafficker British devils want to fight with the Manchu devils Doing a transaction?The Indo-Europeans wanted to get rid of poverty and take off their hat of Aryan barbarian invaders. But wasn't the ancient Indian civilization destroyed by them?