The Debate in the House of Commons on Mr. Mark J. Stewart's Motion for the Abandonment of the Opium Monopoly Friday June 25 1875 Volume Talbot Collection of British Pamphlets

<p>This volume contains the full transcript of the debate held in the House of Commons on June 25 1875 regarding Mr. Mark J. Stewart's motion for the abandonment of the opium monopoly. The historical document offers insights into the political and ethical considerations surrounding British involvement in the opium trade during the 19th century. It is a valuable primary source for understanding the complexities of Anglo-Chinese relations and the moral dilemmas faced by British policymakers at the time. The debate captures a pivotal moment in the history of British imperialism and its impact on global trade and public health. Collected as part of the Talbot Collection of British Pamphlets this text offers researchers and historians a unique window into the debates that shaped British policy and public opinion.</p><p>This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore you will see the original copyright references library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world) and other notations in the work.</p><p>This work is in the public domain in the United States of America and possibly other nations. Within the United States you may freely copy and distribute this work as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.</p><p>As a reproduction of a historical artifact this work may contain missing or blurred pages poor pictures errant marks etc. Scholars believe and we concur that this work is important enough to be preserved reproduced and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.</p>