The future of man in responsibility

Today''s society needs conscientious reasonable people; people who think about the future of future generations; therefore responsible people. The future of man in responsibility allowed us to answer the questions asked in the general introduction. In this reflection at the beginning we tried to put Hans Jonas and Gilbert Hottois at the helm. Hence our concern was rather to explain and oppose the two philosophical currents radically: ecology and technology. The real purpose of this opposition is to find the stumbling block between the two currents. We have tried to reflect on the genesis of disasters in relation to the action of man and the course of nature. And here we have noted the forms of responsibility that the author proposes to us. We will see that Hans Jonas distinguishes parental responsibility from all the other forms of responsibility that he gives in his book. According to this author this form would be the archetype of responsibility.