History of Science

<p>Science is one of the main features of the contemporary world, and shapes our lives to an extent that has no precedents in history. Yet science as we know it today is the outcome of contingent social processes, and its global success is far from self-explanatory. How did it happen? How did science emerge in history and became the most authoritative source of knowledge available in late modern societies? This set of volumes address these crucial questions through a selection of exemplary publications spanning antiquity to the present day. The reader will find an effective survey of the best scholarship in this rapidly growing field, and a map of the main revolutions as well as the long-term continuities that have characterized our understanding the world and our attempts to control it. The volumes bring together areas of inquiry that have become increasingly distant and specialized - such as the history of antique science or Cold War studies - within broader narratives of the making of the modern world. They also reassess the traditional assumption of the exclusively Greek and Western origins of modern science, situating relevant knowledge, practices, and artifacts within the global networks that sustained them – in ancient as well as in modern times. The contributions will address key historiographical issues such as the relationship between science, magic, and religion; the role of science in nation-building processes; and the relationship between science and technology. Throughout the volumes, authors will also engage with broader theoretical issues such as the distribution of agency in the making of science; the way scientific knowledge is made universal; and the interplay of science, technology, and politics. </p> <p>Volume 6: The Modern Life and Earth Sciences</p><p>78. Anne Secord, ‘Artisan Botany’, in Nicholas Jardine, James A. Secord and Emma C. Spary (eds), <i>Cultures of Natural History</i> (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 378-393. </p><p>79. Bernard Lightman, ‘The Creed of Science and Its Critics’, in M. Hewitt (ed.), <i>The Victorian World</i> (Routledge, 2012), pp. 449-465.</p><p>80. Gyan Prakash, ‘Science "Gone Native" in Colonial India’, <i>Representations, </i>40, 1992, 153-178. </p><p>81. Gregory Radick, ‘Race and Language in the Darwinian Tradition (and what Darwin 's Language-Species Parallels Have to Do with It)’, <i>Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences,</i> 39, 2008, 359-370. </p><p>82. Angela N. H. Creager and Gregory J. Morgan, ‘After the Double Helix: Rosalin Franklin’s Research on <i>Tobacco mosaic virus</i>’, <i>Isis, </i>99, 2008, 239-272. </p><p>83. Robert Bud, ‘Life, DNA and the Model’, <i>British Journal for the History of Science</i>, 46, 2013, 311-334. </p><p>84. Erika Lorraine Milam, ‘Making Males Aggressive and Females Coy: Gender Across the Animal-Human Boundary’, <i>Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society</i>, 37, 2012, 935-959. </p><p>85. Rebecca Lemov, ‘Towards a Data Base of Dreams: Assembling an Archive of Elusive Materials, c. 1947–61’, <i>History Workshop Journal</i>, 67, 2009, 44-68. </p><p>86. Peter Galison, ‘The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision’, <i>Critical Inquiry</i>, 21, 1994, 228-266.</p><p>87. Edward Jones-Imhotep, ‘Communicating the North: Scientific Practice and Canadian Postwar Identity’, <i>Osiris</i>, 24, 2009, 144-164. </p><p>88. Fa-ti Fan, ‘"Collective Monitoring, Collective Defense": Science, Earthquakes, and Politics in Communist China’, <i>Science in Context</i>, 25, 2012, 127-154. </p><p>89. Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway, ‘Challenging Knowledge: How Climate Science became a victim of the Cold War’, in R. Proctor and L. Schiebinger (eds), <i>Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance</i> (Stanford University Press, 2008), pp. 55-89. </p><p>90. Deborah R. Coen, ‘Imperial Climatographies from Tyrol to Turkestan’, <i>Osiris</i>, 26, 2011, 45-65. </p><p>91. Paul N. Edwards, ‘Meteorology as Infrastructural Globalism’, <i>Osiris</i>, 21, 2006, 229-250. </p>