The Politics of Place

<b>This critical reexamination of Montesquieu's political science reveals that <i>place </i>is a primary factor in the development of the best political order.</b><br><br>Many Enlightenment thinkers sought to discover the right political order for all times and all places and scholars often view Montesquieu as working within this project. In this reassessment of Montesquieu's political thought Joshua Bandoch finds that Montesquieu broke from this ideal and by taking into account the variation of societies offered a more fruitful approach to the study of politics.<br><br> Through a careful reading of Montesquieu's political writings Bandoch shows that for Montesquieu the politics economics and morals of a society must fit a particular place and its people. As long as states commit to pursuing security liberty and prosperity states can -- indeed should -- define and advance these goals in their own particular ways. Montesquieu saw that the circumstances of a place -- its religion commerce laws institutions physical environment and mores -- determine the best political order for that place. In this sense Montesquieu is the great innovator of what Bandoch calls the politics of place. This new reading of Montesquieu also provides fresh insights into the American founding which Montesquieu so heavily influenced. Instead of having discerned the right political order Bandoch argues the Founders instituted a good political order of which there are numerous versions. <br><br> Joshua Bandoch earned his PhD in political science from the University of Notre Dame. He has taught at Brown University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison.