The problem with Tax-Planning - Avoidance or Evasion

Scientific Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Law - Tax / Fiscal Law grade: _ Jawaharlal Nehru University (Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability) course: Economics(Public Finance & Taxation) language: English abstract: The recent verdict by Supreme Court on Vodafone case generates fresh debates on whether India needs to review her existing legal provisions particularly with respect to offshore tax laws. In thiscontext formal treatment and clear demarcations between tax evasion tax avoidance and tax planning practices are imperative. The Standing Committee on Finance in its 49th Report on Direct Taxes Code bill 2010(submitted to Parliament on 9th march 2012) recommended Controlled Foreign Corporations (CFC) rules Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) along with General Anti Avoidance Rule(GAAR) provision to replace the Income Tax Act 1961 as per the International Taxation Standard and also in line with the recent Chinese Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Law introduced in 2008 to deal with offshore transactions via holding companies. Whereas introduction of GAAR is essential given the limited applications of a specific or targeted anti avoidance rule the Committee also acknowledges the need for an appropriate Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) as GAAR might result in a disproportionate discretionary power for the Income tax authority. The appropriate application of GAAR provision assumes a crucial role in particular with countrieslacking any Limitations of Benefit (LOB) clause (e.g. Mauritius) with India. Before entering into litigation it might be beneficial to settle tax disputes through a bilateral negotiation in the form ofMutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) where tax authorities of the respective countries negotiate to settle disputes in a cordial manner.