In this intriguing book Hendrik Hartog uses a forgotten 1840 case to explore the regime of gradual emancipation that took place in New Jersey over the first half of the nineteenth century. In Minna&#x2019;s case white people fought over who would pay for the costs of caring for a dependent apparently enslaved woman. Hartog marks how the peculiar language mobilized by the debate&#x2014;about care as a &#x201C;mere voluntary courtesy&#x201D;&#x2014;became routine in a wide range of subsequent cases about &#x201C;good Samaritans.&#x201D; Using Minna&#x2019;s case as a springboard Hartog explores the statutes situations and conflicts that helped produce a regime where slavery was usually but not always legal and where a supposedly enslaved person may or may not have been legally free.<br/><br/>In exploring this liminal and unsettled legal space Hartog sheds light on the relationships between moral and legal reasoning and a legal landscape that challenges simplistic notions of what it meant to live in freedom. What emerges is a provocative portrait of a distant legal order that in its contradictions and moral dilemmas bears an ironic resemblance to our own legal world.
Piracy-free
Assured Quality
Secure Transactions
Delivery Options
Please enter pincode to check delivery time.
*COD & Shipping Charges may apply on certain items.