Truth and Fiction in Tim O'Brien's The things they carried

Seminar paper from the year 2011 in the subject American Studies - Literature grade: 27 University of Mannheim (Anglistisches Seminar) course: In Times of Crisis. Representations of War in American Literature and Film from the Civil War to Iraq language: English abstract: In the book The things they carried by Tim O'Brien the narrator says that a good war story is never true. He admits that nearly everything in the book is made up after saying that it is true before. However the reader learns that not until the 7th chapter in which O'Brien the narrator tells the reader that everything up to now has been invented. Similarly he leaves open if some things are true or not. Even the narrator who is named like the author himself is made up and has no or little similarity to the author e.g the author O'Brien does not have a daughter whereas the narrator O'Brien does.Reading The things they carried a question keeps coming up again and again: Why does he do that? Why does Tim O'Brien the narrator constantly tell the reader that everything is made up? It does not make any sense. The reader just gets confused.In addition to this question I found myself wondering if there was a clear difference between truth and fiction in the book namely if you could say this is true and this is untrue and this is certain and this is uncertain. And if yes was it O'Brien's intention to draw this clear line or did it just happen by accident? Of course one cannot know everything for certain and no one can look into O'Brien's brain but you can make assumptions based on the knowledge you have.In my paper I will focus mainly on the aspect why the principle of truth and fiction is used in The things the carried and which effects come out of that. I think this is very interesting because in my opinion this is the main aspect of the whole book. Someone who reads it will not be able to stop themselves from asking questions in their head. The main process while reading