Two Existential Theories of Knowledge

In chapter 1 of this book I explore four paradigms of justification: epistemic foundationalism and coherentism (which I call the traditional paradigms) and pragmatism and contextualism (the existential paradigms). I argue that the existential paradigms are pragmatically superior. In chapter 2 I build a bridge between pragmatist thinkers like James and Dewey contextualists such as Wittgenstein and existentialists such as Sartre and Camus. After arguing that all three share a unique first philosophy I distinguish epistemic pragmatism and contextualism by pointing out three key features of each. In chapter 3 I codify many popular so-called neopragmatists such as Rorty Putnam Annis Alston Quine and Brandom according to my distinction.