The Two Views on the Doctrine of the Trinity

<p><strong>Christians have always believed in the triune God but they haven't always understood or used the doctrine of the Trinity consistently.</strong></p><p>In order to form a coherent view of trinitarian theology it's important for Christians to have a working knowledge of the two legitimate models for explaining this doctrine: </p><ul><li><strong>Classical</strong> - presenting a traditional view of the Trinity represented by the Baptist theologian Stephen R. Holmes and the Roman Catholic theologian Paul D. Molnar.</li><li><strong>Relational</strong> - presenting the promise and potential hazards of a relational doctrine represented by the evangelical theologian Thomas H. McCall and the Baptist philosopher Paul S. Fiddes.</li></ul><p>In this volume of the Counterpoints series leading contributors establish their models and approaches to the doctrine of the Trinity (or the relationship between the threeness and oneness of the divine life). </p><p>Each expert highlights the strengths of his view in order to argue how it best reflects the orthodox perspective. In order to facilitate a genuine debate and to make sure that the key issues are revealed each contributor addresses the same questions regarding their trinitarian methodology doctrine and its implications.</p>